The tattoo generation raises kids

When I was a kid vacationing in Florida amusement parks with my parents, I was always amazed by the exotic images emblazoned on the arms, legs, backs, necks and even the shaved heads of some of the other tourists. These images took the form of names, religious symbols, animals, sports teams and really any other object people found worthy enough to have tattooed on their bodies. Back then, individuals sporting tattoos definitely stood out, and one got the sense that standing out was their goal.

Last week, while visiting Florida, I finally got to experience the sensation of standing out amongst a crowd of tourists, too.  Everywhere I went, I was one of only a handful of people with absolutely no body art. How the times have changed!

I have since embraced my life as an anti-conformist, and my father’s threats to personally scrap off any ink-stained skin with his pocket knife now ring hollow. I have abandoned my ambitions to have “Vote Red,” “Roll Tide” or “Buy American” engraved on my rear end. Although few people would ever see such decorations, I couldn’t quite live with myself if I gave into societal pressure and had a permanent fixture drawn on such a pristine area.

As if having pure skin were not enough to make me stand out in a crowd, I was also a member of a small minority of Florida tourists who spoke English. Being around so many foreign visitors gave me the opportunity to discern that tattoos have now evolved into a global fad. However, unlike Birkenstocks, which I still happen to wear, tattoos cannot be thrown away when they start to seem ugly and unclassy.

The tatted age group I most worry about is the generation that is now raising small children. How are our kids going to fear the “Yes, I got a tattoo” conversation with their parents if their parents have tattoos? If their grandparents have tattoos?

All of this raises an interesting dynamic, which I seriously think could have profound implications for American society and countries around the world. The tattoo generation is raising kids.

My initial instinct was that this means a more liberal, more relaxed family atmosphere. That obviously could translate into more liberal politics, and more religious ambivalence.

I may have been incorrect in that assumption. A plurality of tattoos are Christian symbols. Many, if not most, people with tattoos who I know personally are Republicans. Several of them are Tea Partiers.

Which indicates that our generational obsession with body art does not represent shifting values or evolving ideological predispositions. It is instead a new venue through which old values can be expressed.

Thus, we have arrived at a new cultural norm, which may be more receptive to nontraditional lifestyles and fashions, but is not ideologically different. Nowadays, just as guys don’t take their hats off in restaurants or stand up when a woman walks into a room, it isn’t rebellious to get a cross stained on an arm.

Even though the world is always changing, there are traditions that we can and should preserve, like saying “Yes ma’am” and “no ma’am,” “please” and “thank you.” Like taking our hats off in restaurants and standing up when women walk in a room. Maybe I’m hopelessly nostalgic, but I am going to continue to embrace these timeworn customs. I hope the tattoo generation raises their kids to do the same. Otherwise, I guess devotion to tradition will end up making me the anti-conformist. Ironic, isn’t it?

Tray Smith is the opinions editor of the Crimson White.

  • Jeb

    “Many, if not most, people with tattoos who I know personally are Republicans. Several of them are Tea Partiers.”

    My God, I’m so sick of hearing people refer to Tea Partiers as if they are some kind of right-wing religious nut group! The group is about promoting responsible fiscal policy! What is it that is so complicated about that? I’ve never been to a rally or anything like that but I support them. I’m libertarian but I know Democrats that support it too. Quit acting as if they are some fringe group because it makes you look like a moron that knows anything about them. Are there a few kooks in the group? Sure, but they are everywhere and oftentimes I would guess they are plants from the opposing political party.

    Okay, now that I’ve gotten that out of my system… onto tattoos. I personally don’t have any and don’t really care to get one. Its just not me. I’ve always had the “good guy” look and whatever I do to shake it doesn’t seem to work so it would just make me look like a poser. My wife on the other hand, is an interesting case. She used to be a hardcore Christian and when I flirted with the idea of a tattoo my freshman year (of a cross no less), she told me it goes against God because he says our body is a temple. Well guess what… fast forward 6 years and now she has two. I’ve discovered a side of her I did not know was there. She is very artistic and has a great eye for what looks good (she got me didn’t she? Bazinga!). She is smart though. She didn’t go get a butterfly on her ankle or a tramp-stamp on her lower back. She researched for weeks before each one and found the perfect design that represented a time in her life that she wanted to memorialize.

    So I guess I don’t really have anything super constructive to say other than, people that get tattoos on a whim end up looking stupid and trashy at the beach. There are sooooo many bad tattoos out there and when I see somebody with them, I quickly look the other way. Even a gorgeous woman with a ridiculous tattoo gets no double-take from me. I hope people would spend more than half-a-second thinking about it before they get one. I do have to take issue with you however, because you imply that people with tattoos won’t raise children as well. I don’t see the correlation. You can’t paint an entire generation with such a broad brush. Men haven’t stopped standing up when a woman enters the room because they just got a “Mom” tattoo. They are just old traditions that are dieing out as society adopts new customs and a new identity. That doesn’t mean the old ways are “better” than the new ways… just different.

  • Ashamed

    This article pretty much sums up the number one reason I don’t read the CW: they let discriminating people like you not only write weekly articles, but EDIT the entire opinions section. In one article you have managed to stereotype people with tattoos as conformists (seriously?), foreigners and all tattooed people as being covered in “ugly and unclassy” tattoos, people wearing Birkenstocks (like you!) as proper, classy citizens, tattooed people as poor parents, people with and wanting tattoos as being detrimental to society, tattooed people as liberal, liberals as religiously ambivalent, tattooed people as christians and republicans (yes, and liberals and religiously ambivalent!), and then retracted everything to turn us all into one big happy family whose values aren’t shifting and ideological predispositions aren’t evolving.

    Wow.

    Then you go off, again, and imply that non-Southerners who don’t say “ma’am” are rude. Everything in life is a balance. I suggest you find it and make your “journalism” stop jumping off cliffs, climbing back up and jumping off the other side. Make up your mind and stop stereotyping.

  • Confused

    I was trying to figure out what the point of this column was and couldn’t. After a few moments’ reflection, however, I realized it’s meant to be read in Andy Rooney’s voice.

    Try it, it makes a lot more sense that way!

  • Disappointed

    @ Ashamed: Please don’t take one person’s opinion so seriously that you completely stop reading the CW. I assure you there are plenty of responsible journalists on the staff, and the opinions page is here to express different views and spark debate, which exactly what it’s done right here. I think this piece was well written although I don’t agree with it either.

    @ Tray: I’m not really sure what’ you’re getting at here either. While your writing is good, your points are… off? I have tattoos. Sure, I’m more of a liberal. I’m not particularly religious, either, but I’m not a horrific human being. I certainly don’t think I’m “unclassy” or ugly.
    Sure, tattoos are a fad that has been growing for the past 30 or so years, and it looks like it will continue to do so for a while at least. But I know plenty of people without tattoos. And in my experience, I’ve heard/seen/whatever that getting a tattoo is something you do for yourself, not someone else and certainly not for society. It is (usually) a way of commemorating something or someone important to you.
    Please don’t stereotype all people with tattoos as unclassy people who don’t say yes ma’am and please and thank you.
    Please do that for me, sir, and I’ll refrain from stereotyping all fraternity members who wear short shorts and Birkenstocks. Thank you.

  • http://www.tattoo-removal-chicago.com Tattoo Removal Chicago

    I was thinking to get a tattoo for a long time… I even made a booking… but in a last moment I did change my mind. I did realize that I don’t really need it, there were absolutely no good reasons for getting it done. And I’m totally agree that now you can stand from the crowd by having a clear ink less skin.

Share this on Facebook