Put a stop to administration’s silence

Last week on Oct.r 19, I participated in one of the most wonderful acts of civic engagement I have ever witnessed on this campus – SWACA’s “Not An Isolated Incident” march. It seemed more than a hundred of us were marching across the Quad, united in protest against hate speech and discrimination.

Truly, this year has marked a new dawn of student leadership, involvement, unity and activism at UA – throughout the campus, there seems to be a renewed understanding of people power and the significance of publicly demonstrating discontent with the status quo.

Disillusionment surrounding the administration’s communication with students on important issues has proven to be a catalyst for such a transition. When questions concerning SGA scandals arise again and again, the powers that be hide behind FERPA. When students expect leadership following racist hate crimes, President Witt sends one of his infamous emails and the subject is never brought up again.

Not only does the administration remain quiet in the face of direct acts of racism on campus, but students are also ignored regarding their questions concerning indirect indiscretions. Those of us opposed to the Shepherd Bend mine proposal have been pressuring the UA System for a solid year to take a stance on the mine, and they have continuously declined to comment. When they do comment, they claim that “there are no current plans to lease or sell land at Shepherd Bend” – a neutral, safe response. But what about the future?

Since fall of last year, the UA Environmental Council and many other groups across the state of Alabama have fought the mine, which is proposed to be built on University property at a place called Shepherd Bend along the Black Warrior River in Walker County. The mine has nearly all of the necessary permits to begin construction. If built, it would discharge wastewater 800 feet upstream and directly across from the Birmingham Water Works Board intake at Mulberry Fork. That intake provides drinking water for 200,000 Birmingham citizens.

This summer, while interning for the Black Warrior Riverkeeper, I attended neighborhood association meetings of Birmingham communities that receive water from the Mulberry Fork intake in order to spread the word about this issue.

Ninety percent of these were predominantly black or lower income communities. It is nearly impossible to legitimately prove that this mine’s construction represents “environmental racism,” but a complete and utter lack of justice is apparent. Would this proposal have ever left the drawing board if the intake provided water for Vestavia or Mountain Brook? If you need an answer to that question, you must not know Alabama very well.

The future of this mine depends on a decision to lease land and mineral rights at Shepherd Bend by the UA administration and the Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama System. The administration has blatantly shown it cares little for the environmental and public health impacts coal mining can cause.

In a pamphlet distributed through The Crimson White a few weeks ago, the University’s stormwater management plan is sensationalized through propagation of messages like “This is our water. We must protect it,” referring to the Black Warrior River. An entire page of this pamphlet is devoted to advertising Walter Energy, the company responsible for the North River coal ash slurry spill this summer. That spill very nearly contaminated our drinking water right here in Tuscaloosa.

The University’s hypocrisy regarding environmental stewardship and the well being of Alabama citizens is absolutely appalling. You don’t have to be an engineer to understand the implications of a strip mine discharging wastewater directly across from a drinking water intake. You don’t have to be a public health worker to know that the health of thousands of people could be at risk if this intake was to be contaminated. This is not just an environmental issue; it is a public health and social justice issue.

We have sent letters, made phone calls, passed resolutions and signed petitions regarding the Shepherd Bend mine. We are at a tipping point – what we need now the most is bodies, faces and voices of students that care. It is time for us to stand up – as students, citizens, and stakeholders of the University – and demand the UA System publicly condemn this proposal and pledge this land will not be used for mining in the future. The water resources of our state’s citizens are too precious to lose for a handful of coal, and if we are successful, the University of Alabama could set a precedent of environmental stewardship for years to come.

Let us continue to foster this renewed sense of civic engagement against injustice. Please join the UA Environmental Council and the UA Chapter of the NAACP in the fight against this dangerous proposal. Join us if you want real leadership from our campus administration. Join us if you believe that we need real answers. Join us if you believe in true justice.

  • Jeb

    “Would this proposal have ever left the drawing board if the intake
    provided water for Vestavia or Mountain Brook? If you need an answer to
    that question, you must not know Alabama very well.”

    You imply that the construction is racially motivated but I’d bet that if those same black people lived in the kinds of homes that existed in Vestavia or Mountain Brook, you’d run into the same resistance. I don’t think it is as much a racial issue as it is a money issue. Now you can argue that the fact that they have less money is due to institutional racism and yada yada yada, but this isn’t exactly flagrant racism on display. Throwing the race card every chance you get does a disservice to people that suffer REAL racism. It diminishes the impact in the eyes of the rest of us when everything negative that happens to a minority is called racism. Sure, this situation is unfair… but if it was a trailer-park full of white people, do you REALLY think that the color of the residents’ skin would be a factor in the financial decision of whether to proceed with construction or not? Whether we want to admit it or not, money and power can influence decisions like these and the current residents or the hypothetical trailer park has neither. It is admirable to stand up for them but don’t cry racism every time life isn’t fair.

    “When questions concerning SGA scandals arise again and again, the powers that be hide behind FERPA.”

    Just to play devil’s advocate for a minute… what if the “powers that be” didn’t hide behind FERPA and instead released the suspect’s name (assuming there was a suspect)? What if the suspect then sued the university for violation of FERPA and drug the university through a costly legal battle and ultimately won since afterall… we are talking about a federal law here? Lets take it a step further. What if that suspect then turned out to be innocent? What if that suspect received threats as a result of having his or her name released?

    • http://www.facebook.com/joey.crowell Joey Crowell

      I came here to make this exact point;  when discussing criminal statistics among ethnic groups, most respectable people acknowledge that it is not due to a trait inherent to their race, but rather a result of poverty that, due to a variety of historical and unfortunately current socioeconomic policies, afflicts some ethnic groups more than others.  Throwing out the race card in this case is definitely a poor decision, one that further disenfranchises poorer individuals as a whole and gives less credence to legitimate cases of flagrant racism.  I’d be willing to rescind on this point if it could be proved that this was a racially motivated plan, but as far as I can tell it just seems like it’s just purely about the money for those involved.

      • Anonymous

        Just another example of how the CW is beginning to double as the NAACP leaflet…

        • http://www.facebook.com/joey.crowell Joey Crowell

          I wouldn’t go that far.  I just think there are plenty of legitimate racial issues occurring on campus that needless sensationalism on unrelated issues will detract from.

    • Anonymous

      In regards to your second point, student government documents aren’t academic records. Moreover, the “suspect(s)” in this particular case are Grant Cochran and Sarah Lavender, who both resigned amid allegations of First Year Council corruption; presumable, the documents would address the specifics of that. This isn’t an instance of guilty/not guilty so much as discovering the specific motive behind the resignations. 

      • Jeb

        My mistake. I skimmed that part of the article and thought it was in reference to the person that painted racist comments on the wall of a building. Forgot about the SGA thing. So many controversies to choose from… the CW has certainly been busy this semester!

    • Anonymous

      Have you read Robert Bullard’s book Dumping in Dixie?  If not, give it a read.  While no one is suggesting that racism was the only reason why the Shepard Bend mine is proceeding the way it is, Bullard identifies a pattern of Black communities in the South almost always bearing the brunt of environmental calamities.  Bullard shows that Black communities are disproportionately besieged by waste and pollution even when you control for socioeconomic class.  Your impression that this is a money issue and not a race issue is a reasonable impression, to be sure, but as Bullard and other environmental sociologists have demonstrated time and time again, race is a major determining factor as to which areas will be polluted and which areas will not.

      This post, and many other comments like it that white people make around water cooler, at their dinner tables, and everywhere else, shows how little white people take claims of racism seriously.  Even when there is a reasonable body of literature, both academic and popular, white folks seem to almost always accuse people of color and organizations like the NAACP of “playing the race card” without even examing aforementioned body of literature to see if they indeed have a point.

      • Jeb

        “This post, and many other comments like it that white people make around
        water cooler, at their dinner tables, and everywhere else, shows how
        little white people take claims of racism seriously.”

        Really? Bringing up a reasonable question as to whether the actions of a corporation looking to build a mine are based in racism or simple financial gain demonstrates how little seriousness I attribute to racism? You referenced one obscure book that I’ve never heard of and claim it as the authority on this topic. While I’m sure it has some good information and would enlighten me on the details of similar actions in Alabama, I find it a bit premature for you to accuse people that are raising questions as to whether throwing the race card is a bit of a knee-jerk reaction in this case. I don’t deny real racism exists on the fringes of our society or even that institutional racism has led to the continuation of a lot (not all) of minorities’ problems in this country. I do, however, find it counter-productive for the oftentimes well-meaning race warriors to bring up race as the reason for a problem or attribute racism to anybody who poses a question to your ideas.
        When race is the reason for all the problems facing minorities, those race warriors begin to look like the boy who cried wolf. We become desensitized to the term and it does a disservice to those truly affected by racism. Similarly, when you call (or imply) an opponent is racist every time they raise a question about your way of thinking, you begin to look like you are hiding behind the word and using it too liberally because you don’t want to respond to hard questions. I’m not referring to you specifically because you didn’t call me a racist, but you imply that I don’t care or that I don’t take racism concerns seriously because I didn’t immediately jump on the bandwagon and join hands with my minority brothers and sisters, march down main street, and call the miners racist. I was trying to provide an alternative, and I believe very reasonable, reason as to why these things seem to happen disproportionately in black neighborhoods. If you have statistics to prove that theory wrong, then present them and if I can validate them and not find conflicting studies, then I will stand corrected. Simply claiming I don’t care because I didn’t know of a study done in a book I’ve never heard of is pretty weak.

        • Anonymous

          With regard to environmental racism, Dumping in Dixie is by no means obscure– it is quite literally THE book on the topic.  Furthermore, there is an entire body of literature on environmental racism that is quite well-documented and presents statistical patterns with regard to pollutive endeavors in communities of color.  Look into an academic database, go to a library, or just do a 30-second Google search and you can find a ton of information about pollution disparities between white communities and communities of color.  I’m not jumping on your case because you refuse to immediately agree with every claim that something is racist– rather, I’m accusing you of overlooking racism by not even giving claims of racism the time of day.  To claim that environmental racism doesn’t exist is to show that you developed your opinion on pre-existing notions and couldn’t even be bothered to think, “you know, this claim might have merit; perhaps I’ll do a 30-second Google search to verify.”  No one who has researched the topic of environmental racism for more than five minutes could claim that race has nothing to do with pollution disparities.

          More fundamentally, I think we’re defining racism differently.  You seem to think that racism exists only on “the fringes of society”– you, basically, have a misconception that the only sort of racism is the kind that involves backwoods crazies in white hoods.  Indeed, that is quite rare, thank goodness.  However, most people of color and academics would probably also include in racism any policies which ossify or increase racial disparities.  So the bifurcation between financial motivation and racism is a false dichotomy– even if mining companies have absolutely no animus whatsoever towards Black people (and for all I know, they do not), this project will still unfairly pollute Black communities and profit primarily white people, making it racist ipso facto.  As authors like Tim Wise (an author who is by no means obscure, and who I highly recommend to white people who are beginning to read about racism for the first time) show, race is one of the top determinants of life chances as a result of institutional racism, but whites continually accuse people of color of “playing the race card” the instant anyone acknowledges that well-documented truth.

          • Jeb

            “To claim that environmental racism doesn’t exist is to show that you
            developed your opinion on pre-existing notions and couldn’t even be
            bothered to think, “you know, this claim might have merit; perhaps I’ll
            do a 30-second Google search to verify.’ ”

            touche… I’ll check out your book.

  • http://twitter.com/Crimson__Heart Dawn

    Social justice is a misnomer. There is no such animal as social justice. The bourgeois believes in the dignity of their own. The proletariat only counts during election time when they are the most easily influenced and, because of intentionally inflicted media ignorance, vote against themselves.

Share this on Facebook